低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置のグローバル市場2023年:翼構造、盾構造

【英語タイトル】Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Research Report 2023

QYResearchが出版した調査資料(QYR23MA8149)・商品コード:QYR23MA8149
・発行会社(調査会社):QYResearch
・発行日:2023年3月(※2025年版があります。お問い合わせください。)
・ページ数:105
・レポート言語:英語
・レポート形式:PDF
・納品方法:Eメール(受注後2-3営業日)
・調査対象地域:グローバル
・産業分野:医療機器
◆販売価格オプション(消費税別)
Single User(1名様閲覧用)USD2,900 ⇒換算¥417,600見積依頼/購入/質問フォーム
Multi User(5名様閲覧用)USD4,350 ⇒換算¥626,400見積依頼/購入/質問フォーム
Enterprise License(同一法人内共有可)USD5,800 ⇒換算¥835,200見積依頼/購入/質問フォーム
販売価格オプションの説明
※お支払金額:換算金額(日本円)+消費税
※納期:即日〜2営業日(3日以上かかる場合は別途表記又はご連絡)
※お支払方法:納品日+5日以内に請求書を発行・送付(請求書発行日より2ヶ月以内に銀行振込、振込先:三菱UFJ銀行/H&Iグローバルリサーチ株式会社、支払期限と方法は調整可能)
❖ レポートの概要 ❖

本調査レポートは世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場について調査・分析し、世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場概要、メーカー別競争状況、地域別市場規模、タイプ別セグメント分析(翼構造、盾構造)、用途別セグメント分析(病院、クリニック)、主要企業のプロファイル、市場動向などに関する情報を掲載しています。主要企業としては、Teleflex Medical、Medtronic、CooperSurgical、Golden Stapler、Pride Medical Equipment、Double Medical Technology、Jiangsu Anno、Dongfeng Yihe、Portoria Medical、Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology、Hangzhou Valued Medtech、Henan Shenghua、Endosystem、Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology、Anhui Aofoなどが含まれています。世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場は、2022年にXXX米ドル、2029年にはXXX米ドルに達すると予測され、予測期間の年平均成長率はXXX%です。COVID-19とロシア・ウクライナ戦争の影響は、低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模を推定する際に考慮しました。

・低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場の概要
- 製品の定義
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置のタイプ別セグメント
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模:タイプ別分析(翼構造、盾構造)
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の用途別セグメント
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模:用途別分析(病院、クリニック)
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模予測(2018年-2029年)
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の平均価格推移(2018年-2029年)
- 前提条件と制限事項

・メーカー別競争状況
- メーカー別市場シェア
- 世界の主要メーカー、業界ランキング分析
- メーカー別平均価格
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場の競争状況およびトレンド

・低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の地域別市場規模
- 北米の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- アメリカの低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- ヨーロッパの低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- アジア太平洋の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- 中国の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- 日本の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- 韓国の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- インドの低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- オーストラリアの低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- 中南米の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)
- 中東・アフリカの低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場規模(2018年-2029年)

・タイプ別セグメント:翼構造、盾構造
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置のタイプ別販売量(2018年-2023年)
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置のタイプ別売上(2018年-2023年)
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置のタイプ別価格

・用途別セグメント:病院、クリニック
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の用途別販売量(2018年-2023年)
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の用途別売上(2018年-2023年)
- 世界の低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の用途別価格

・主要企業のプロファイル:企業情報、事業概要、売上、製品ポートフォリオ、動向
Teleflex Medical、Medtronic、CooperSurgical、Golden Stapler、Pride Medical Equipment、Double Medical Technology、Jiangsu Anno、Dongfeng Yihe、Portoria Medical、Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology、Hangzhou Valued Medtech、Henan Shenghua、Endosystem、Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology、Anhui Aofo

・産業チェーンと販売チャネルの分析
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置産業チェーン分析
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の主要原材料
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の販売チャネル
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置のディストリビューター
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の主要顧客

・低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場ダイナミクス
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の業界動向
- 低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置市場の成長ドライバ、課題、阻害要因

・調査成果および結論

・調査方法とデータソース

Highlights
The global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device market was valued at US$ 282.3 million in 2022 and is anticipated to reach US$ 434.3 million by 2029, witnessing a CAGR of 5.9% during the forecast period 2023-2029. The influence of COVID-19 and the Netherlands-Ukraine War were considered while estimating market sizes.
Global key players of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device include Teleflex Medical, Medtronic and CooperSurgical, etc. Global top three manufacturers hold a share about 75%. United States is the largest producer of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device, followed by Europe and China.
Report Scope
This report aims to provide a comprehensive presentation of the global market for Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device, with both quantitative and qualitative analysis, to help readers develop business/growth strategies, assess the market competitive situation, analyze their position in the current marketplace, and make informed business decisions regarding Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device.
The Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device market size, estimations, and forecasts are provided in terms of sales volume (K units) and revenue ($ millions), considering 2022 as the base year, with history and forecast data for the period from 2018 to 2029. This report segments the global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device market comprehensively. Regional market sizes, concerning products by type, by application and by players, are also provided.
For a more in-depth understanding of the market, the report provides profiles of the competitive landscape, key competitors, and their respective market ranks. The report also discusses technological trends and new product developments.
The report will help the Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device manufacturers, new entrants, and industry chain related companies in this market with information on the revenues, sales volume, and average price for the overall market and the sub-segments across the different segments, by company, by type, by application and by regions.
By Company
Teleflex Medical
Medtronic
CooperSurgical
Golden Stapler
Pride Medical Equipment
Double Medical Technology
Jiangsu Anno
Dongfeng Yihe
Portoria Medical
Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology
Hangzhou Valued Medtech
Henan Shenghua
Endosystem
Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology
Anhui Aofo
Segment by Type
Winged Structure
Shield Structure
Segment by Application
Hospital
Clinic
Consumption by Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
India
Australia
China Taiwan
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Argentina
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Core Chapters
Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, executive summary of different market segments (by region, product type, application, etc), including the market size of each market segment, future development potential, and so on. It offers a high-level view of the current state of the market and its likely evolution in the short to mid-term, and long term.
Chapter 2: Detailed analysis of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device manufacturers competitive landscape, price, sales and revenue market share, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 3: Sales, revenue of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device in regional level and country level. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and its main countries and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and market size of each country in the world.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments by type, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 5: Provides the analysis of various market segments by application, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 6: Provides profiles of key players, introducing the basic situation of the key companies in the market in detail, including product sales, revenue, price, gross margin, product introduction, recent development, etc.
Chapter 7: Analysis of industrial chain, including the upstream and downstream of the industry.
Chapter 8: Introduces the market dynamics, latest developments of the market, the driving factors and restrictive factors of the market, the challenges and risks faced by manufacturers in the industry, and the analysis of relevant policies in the industry.
Chapter 9: The main points and conclusions of the report.
COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine War Influence Analysis
The readers in the section will understand how the Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device market scenario changed across the globe during the pandemic, post-pandemic and Russia-Ukraine War. The study is done keeping in view the changes in aspects such as demand, consumption, transportation, consumer behavior, supply chain management, export and import, and production. The industry experts have also highlighted the key factors that will help create opportunities for players and stabilize the overall industry in the years to come.
Reasons to Buy This Report
This report will help the readers to understand the competition within the industries and strategies for the competitive environment to enhance the potential profit. The report also focuses on the competitive landscape of the global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device market, and introduces in detail the market share, industry ranking, competitor ecosystem, market performance, new product development, operation situation, expansion, and acquisition. etc. of the main players, which helps the readers to identify the main competitors and deeply understand the competition pattern of the market.
This report will help stakeholders to understand the global industry status and trends of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device and provides them with information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.
This report will help stakeholders to understand competitors better and gain more insights to strengthen their position in their businesses. The competitive landscape section includes the market share and rank (in volume and value), competitor ecosystem, new product development, expansion, and acquisition.
This report stays updated with novel technology integration, features, and the latest developments in the market
This report helps stakeholders to understand the COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine War Influence on the Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device industry.
This report helps stakeholders to gain insights into which regions to target globally
This report helps stakeholders to gain insights into the end-user perception concerning the adoption of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device.
This report helps stakeholders to identify some of the key players in the market and understand their valuable contribution.
Core Chapters
Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, executive summary of different market segments (by region, product type, application, etc), including the market size of each market segment, future development potential, and so on. It offers a high-level view of the current state of the market and its likely evolution in the short to mid-term, and long term.
Chapter 2: Detailed analysis of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device manufacturers competitive landscape, price, sales and revenue market share, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 3: Sales, revenue of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device in regional level and country level. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and its main countries and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and market size of each country in the world.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments according to product types, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 5: Provides the analysis of various market segments according to application, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 6: Provides profiles of key players, introducing the basic situation of the main companies in the market in detail, including product sales, revenue, price, gross margin, product introduction, recent development, etc.
Chapter 7: Analysis of industrial chain, including the upstream and downstream of the industry.
Chapter 8: Analysis of sales channel, distributors and customers
Chapter 9: Introduces the market dynamics, latest developments of the market, the driving factors and restrictive factors of the market, the challenges and risks faced by manufacturers in the industry, and the analysis of relevant policies in the industry.
Chapter 10: sales and revenue forecast, global and regional, by Type and by Application. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each market segment in the next six years.
Chapter 11: The main points and conclusions of the report.

グローバル市場調査レポート販売サイトのwww.marketreport.jpです。

❖ レポートの目次 ❖

1 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device
1.2 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Value Comparison by Type (2023-2029)
1.2.2 Winged Structure
1.2.3 Shield Structure
1.3 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Value by Application: (2023-2029)
1.3.2 Hospital
1.3.3 Clinic
1.4 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Size Estimates and Forecasts
1.4.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue 2018-2029
1.4.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales 2018-2029
1.4.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Average Price (2018-2029)
1.5 Assumptions and Limitations
2 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales Market Share by Manufacturers (2018-2023)
2.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2018-2023)
2.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Average Price by Manufacturers (2018-2023)
2.4 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Industry Ranking 2021 VS 2022 VS 2023
2.5 Global Key Manufacturers of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device, Manufacturing Sites & Headquarters
2.6 Global Key Manufacturers of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device, Product Type & Application
2.7 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.7.1 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Concentration Rate
2.7.2 The Global Top 5 and Top 10 Largest Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Players Market Share by Revenue
2.7.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
2.8 Manufacturers Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
3 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Retrospective Market Scenario by Region
3.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Size by Region: 2018 Versus 2022 Versus 2029
3.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Region: 2018-2029
3.2.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Region: 2018-2023
3.2.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Region: 2024-2029
3.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Region: 2018-2029
3.3.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Region: 2018-2023
3.3.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Region: 2024-2029
3.4 North America Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Facts & Figures by Country
3.4.1 North America Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Size by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
3.4.2 North America Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Country (2018-2029)
3.4.3 North America Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Country (2018-2029)
3.4.4 United States
3.4.5 Canada
3.5 Europe Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Facts & Figures by Country
3.5.1 Europe Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Size by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
3.5.2 Europe Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Country (2018-2029)
3.5.3 Europe Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Country (2018-2029)
3.5.4 Germany
3.5.5 France
3.5.6 U.K.
3.5.7 Italy
3.5.8 Russia
3.6 Asia Pacific Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Facts & Figures by Country
3.6.1 Asia Pacific Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Size by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
3.6.2 Asia Pacific Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Country (2018-2029)
3.6.3 Asia Pacific Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Country (2018-2029)
3.6.4 China
3.6.5 Japan
3.6.6 South Korea
3.6.7 India
3.6.8 Australia
3.6.9 China Taiwan
3.6.10 Indonesia
3.6.11 Thailand
3.6.12 Malaysia
3.7 Latin America Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Facts & Figures by Country
3.7.1 Latin America Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Size by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
3.7.2 Latin America Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Country (2018-2029)
3.7.3 Latin America Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Country (2018-2029)
3.7.4 Mexico
3.7.5 Brazil
3.7.6 Argentina
3.8 Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Facts & Figures by Country
3.8.1 Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Size by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
3.8.2 Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Country (2018-2029)
3.8.3 Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Country (2018-2029)
3.8.4 Turkey
3.8.5 Saudi Arabia
3.8.6 UAE
4 Segment by Type
4.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Type (2018-2029)
4.1.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Type (2018-2023)
4.1.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Type (2024-2029)
4.1.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales Market Share by Type (2018-2029)
4.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Type (2018-2029)
4.2.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Type (2018-2023)
4.2.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Type (2024-2029)
4.2.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue Market Share by Type (2018-2029)
4.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Price by Type (2018-2029)
5 Segment by Application
5.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Application (2018-2029)
5.1.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Application (2018-2023)
5.1.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales by Application (2024-2029)
5.1.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales Market Share by Application (2018-2029)
5.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Application (2018-2029)
5.2.1 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Application (2018-2023)
5.2.2 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue by Application (2024-2029)
5.2.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Revenue Market Share by Application (2018-2029)
5.3 Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Price by Application (2018-2029)
6 Key Companies Profiled
6.1 Teleflex Medical
6.1.1 Teleflex Medical Corporation Information
6.1.2 Teleflex Medical Description and Business Overview
6.1.3 Teleflex Medical Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.1.4 Teleflex Medical Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.1.5 Teleflex Medical Recent Developments/Updates
6.2 Medtronic
6.2.1 Medtronic Corporation Information
6.2.2 Medtronic Description and Business Overview
6.2.3 Medtronic Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.2.4 Medtronic Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.2.5 Medtronic Recent Developments/Updates
6.3 CooperSurgical
6.3.1 CooperSurgical Corporation Information
6.3.2 CooperSurgical Description and Business Overview
6.3.3 CooperSurgical Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.3.4 CooperSurgical Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.3.5 CooperSurgical Recent Developments/Updates
6.4 Golden Stapler
6.4.1 Golden Stapler Corporation Information
6.4.2 Golden Stapler Description and Business Overview
6.4.3 Golden Stapler Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.4.4 Golden Stapler Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.4.5 Golden Stapler Recent Developments/Updates
6.5 Pride Medical Equipment
6.5.1 Pride Medical Equipment Corporation Information
6.5.2 Pride Medical Equipment Description and Business Overview
6.5.3 Pride Medical Equipment Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.5.4 Pride Medical Equipment Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.5.5 Pride Medical Equipment Recent Developments/Updates
6.6 Double Medical Technology
6.6.1 Double Medical Technology Corporation Information
6.6.2 Double Medical Technology Description and Business Overview
6.6.3 Double Medical Technology Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.6.4 Double Medical Technology Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.6.5 Double Medical Technology Recent Developments/Updates
6.7 Jiangsu Anno
6.6.1 Jiangsu Anno Corporation Information
6.6.2 Jiangsu Anno Description and Business Overview
6.6.3 Jiangsu Anno Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.4.4 Jiangsu Anno Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.7.5 Jiangsu Anno Recent Developments/Updates
6.8 Dongfeng Yihe
6.8.1 Dongfeng Yihe Corporation Information
6.8.2 Dongfeng Yihe Description and Business Overview
6.8.3 Dongfeng Yihe Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.8.4 Dongfeng Yihe Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.8.5 Dongfeng Yihe Recent Developments/Updates
6.9 Portoria Medical
6.9.1 Portoria Medical Corporation Information
6.9.2 Portoria Medical Description and Business Overview
6.9.3 Portoria Medical Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.9.4 Portoria Medical Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.9.5 Portoria Medical Recent Developments/Updates
6.10 Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology
6.10.1 Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology Corporation Information
6.10.2 Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology Description and Business Overview
6.10.3 Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.10.4 Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.10.5 Jiangsu Baoduoliya Medical Technology Recent Developments/Updates
6.11 Hangzhou Valued Medtech
6.11.1 Hangzhou Valued Medtech Corporation Information
6.11.2 Hangzhou Valued Medtech Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Description and Business Overview
6.11.3 Hangzhou Valued Medtech Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.11.4 Hangzhou Valued Medtech Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.11.5 Hangzhou Valued Medtech Recent Developments/Updates
6.12 Henan Shenghua
6.12.1 Henan Shenghua Corporation Information
6.12.2 Henan Shenghua Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Description and Business Overview
6.12.3 Henan Shenghua Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.12.4 Henan Shenghua Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.12.5 Henan Shenghua Recent Developments/Updates
6.13 Endosystem
6.13.1 Endosystem Corporation Information
6.13.2 Endosystem Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Description and Business Overview
6.13.3 Endosystem Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.13.4 Endosystem Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.13.5 Endosystem Recent Developments/Updates
6.14 Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology
6.14.1 Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology Corporation Information
6.14.2 Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Description and Business Overview
6.14.3 Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.14.4 Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.14.5 Jiangsu Hongai Medical Technology Recent Developments/Updates
6.15 Anhui Aofo
6.15.1 Anhui Aofo Corporation Information
6.15.2 Anhui Aofo Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Description and Business Overview
6.15.3 Anhui Aofo Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
6.15.4 Anhui Aofo Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Product Portfolio
6.15.5 Anhui Aofo Recent Developments/Updates
7 Industry Chain and Sales Channels Analysis
7.1 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Industry Chain Analysis
7.2 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Key Raw Materials
7.2.1 Key Raw Materials
7.2.2 Raw Materials Key Suppliers
7.3 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Production Mode & Process
7.4 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales and Marketing
7.4.1 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Sales Channels
7.4.2 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Distributors
7.5 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Customers
8 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Dynamics
8.1 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Industry Trends
8.2 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Drivers
8.3 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Challenges
8.4 Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Restraints
9 Research Finding and Conclusion
10 Methodology and Data Source
10.1 Methodology/Research Approach
10.1.1 Research Programs/Design
10.1.2 Market Size Estimation
10.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
10.2 Data Source
10.2.1 Secondary Sources
10.2.2 Primary Sources
10.3 Author List
10.4 Disclaimer


※参考情報

低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置(Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device)は、外科手術における術後回復を促進し、術後合併症を軽減するために設計された医療機器です。この装置は、筋膜の適切な閉鎖を実現することで、患者に与える身体的負担を最小限に抑えることを目的としています。近年、外科手術において低侵襲技術が広く採用されている背景には、患者の早期回復、痛みの軽減、そして入院期間の短縮が求められていることがあります。このため、低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置は外科的手技の中で重要な役割を果たしています。

低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の定義を考えると、通常は筋膜をしっかりと閉じることができ、最小限の切開または傷を伴う方法で操作が行える装置といえます。これにより、手術後に筋膜が適切に閉じられることで、内臓の正常な位置を維持し、術後の合併症、特にヘルニアのリスクを軽減します。

主な特徴としては、まずその設計が挙げられます。低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置は、しばしば特許を取得した特殊な機構を持ち、医療スタッフが簡単に使用できるようになっています。また、装置は軽量で操作がしやすく、通常の手術器具に組み合わせて使用されることが多いです。その構造により、鋭利な部分や突起が少なく、患者の体に負担をかけない設計がなされています。

さらに、低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の種類には様々なものがあります。例えば、バイポーラ式、トリプレット式、またはシングルポイント式などがあり、それぞれに異なる原理や動作方法があります。これらの装置は、効果的な筋膜の閉鎖を可能にし、外科医が必要な筋膜を適切に引き寄せることを助けます。

具体的な用途については、一般的な外科手術や腹腔鏡手術、またはその他の内視鏡的手技において、低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置が活用されています。例えば、腸の手術や胃の切除、さらにはその他の臓器に対するアプローチ時において、筋膜を閉じるために使用されることがあります。これにより、筋膜が閉じている状態を保持することで、患者の体内環境が安定し、回復が早まると言われています。

関連技術としては、ロボティック外科手術や3D画像ガイド技術などが挙げられます。これらの技術と連携することで、より高精度な外科医療が実現され、低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置の効果がさらに高まります。ロボティック手術は、極めて精密な操作が可能であり、手術器具の操作を一層スムーズにすることができます。また、3D画像ガイド技術は、手術前後の状態を視覚化することにより、外科医がより良い判断を下す手助けをします。

このように、低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置は現代医療において重要な役割を果たしており、今後も技術の進歩や新しい装置の開発が期待されています。特に、患者の早期回復と術後合併症の予防に寄与することから、医療現場での需要はますます高まっていくことでしょう。

医療分野においては、患者の健康を守るために技術革新が続けられており、低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置もその一環として重要視されています。患者にとっては、手術の質や安全性を向上させ、術後の生活の質を高めるために、こうした装置の使用が益々普及していくことが期待されます。そして、医療従事者にとっては、より効率的で効果的な手術の実施が可能になるため、外科医の手技向上にも寄与することができます。

将来的には、さらなる技術革新や新しい素材の開発が進むことで、低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置はより進化し、より多くの患者にbenefitをもたらすことになるでしょう。このため、医療業界に関わる全ての人々が、最新の技術を学び、それを活用することが求められています。このような進展を通じて、外科領域全体の医療が向上し、患者の健康と福祉に貢献することが期待されます。


★調査レポート[低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置のグローバル市場2023年:翼構造、盾構造] (コード:QYR23MA8149)販売に関する免責事項を必ずご確認ください。
★調査レポート[低侵襲筋膜閉鎖装置のグローバル市場2023年:翼構造、盾構造]についてメールでお問い合わせ


◆H&Iグローバルリサーチのお客様(例)◆